|
Click
the above link to receive your 3-in-1 Report with FICO Score
If
you or someone you know is struggling or unable to meet your obligations Contact
Me for a FREE no-obligation evaluation to see if a program is right for you!
Or
Call 813-354-2563
•
FREE
Weekly Tip!
•
My
Personal Invitation
•
Who
Should Attend
•
Attend
A Workshop
•
Workshop
Schedule
•
Order
Home Study Course •
Tell
a Friend •
Contact Me!
|
Old Scams
Keep Finding New Suckers
There's a reason the same cons reappear year after year: They use
time-tested ways of pushing just the right buttons to make us give up
our cash or personal information.
By
Jennifer Mulrean
As Seen on MSN.Com
Every year, the Federal Trade Commission's Consumer Sentinel issues a
report on the top scams of the year, based on the number of complaints
filed to watchdog organizations like the FTC and the National Consumer's
League. What's startling about these lists isn't the volume of
complaints -- more than 635,000 filed in 2004 -- or the dollar value of
reported losses -- $547 million last year.
What's perplexing is how little the list changes each year.
Among online frauds, Internet auctions have topped the Consumer Sentinel
list every year, followed by online shopping/catalog sales,
Internet-access scams, foreign money offers and variations of the same
old same old. A fraud may move around on the list – the Nigerian scam
was No. 5 among Internet scams in 2003 and No. 4 last year. But the
status quo seems to prevail year after year.
Sure, new technology makes new scams possible, but in general, con
artists aren't that creative. They don't have to be. The same
tricks work over and over again. Why?
Anatomy of a scam
Doug Shadel, the AARP's Washington state director, and Anthony Pratkanis,
a social psychology professor at the University of California, Santa
Cruz, have been studying cons' pitches through more than 600 telephone
conversations taped by the FBI. (Consumers who were being targeted had
their calls forwarded to investigators, who then posed as the victims.)
The two, who are writing a consumer guidebook due in June, transcribed
325 of those tapes and identified 15 common strategies used by the con
artists. Learn to recognize these "social influence" tactics and you can
better your odds for stopping a fraud in its tracks.
|
The top frauds of the year |
|
The Consumer Sentinel's list of top frauds represents more than
635,000 complaints filed to watchdogs like the FTC and the
National Consumer's League. The Sentinel doesn't track
complaints by person, or even determine if each complaint
represents someone who actually lost money to the scam. So it's
hard to know if the same people are repeatedly falling for the
schemes, or if they're being proactive about alerting the
authorities.
Still, the lists have been fairly stable for years now. Identity
theft has reigned at No. 1 for the last five years, and Internet
auctions have dominated Internet-related frauds since the
Sentinel began breaking those out from its general report a few
years ago.
One interesting note: The broad complaint categories may mask
newer schemes, such as
phishing, that take
advantage of technology to steal personal information, says
Betsy Broder, the FTC's assistant director for planning and
information. "As a subset in each category, we're seeing some
attempt of data theft," she says.
This means consumers may be reporting one type of fraud -- say,
a business opportunity that didn't pan out as promised-- when
they're actually a victim of another.
"Sometimes victims never connect the new accounts opened in
their name with the initial fraud," such as an ad they answered
for a job, Broder says.
Consumer Sentinel's top 10 consumer complaints in
2004:
-
Identity
theft (39%)
-
Internet
auctions (16%)
-
Shop-at-home/catalog sales (8%)
-
Internet
services and computer complaints (6%)
-
Foreign
money offers (6%)
-
Prizes/sweepstakes and lotteries (5%)
-
Advance-fee
loans and credit protection (3%)
-
Business
opportunities and work-at-home plans (2%)
-
Telephone
services (2%)
-
Other
(miscellaneous) 12%
Consumer Sentinel's top Internet-related scams
for 2004:
-
Internet
auctions (48%)
-
Shop-at-home/catalog sales (17%)
-
Internet-access services (10%)
-
Foreign
money offers (6%)
-
Internet
info and adult services (3%)
-
Computers:
Equipment and software (2%)
-
Business
opportunities and work-at-home plans (2%)
(The remainder of Net-related complaint categories each
comprised 1% or less.) |
There are usually four steps to pulling off a scam, says Pratkanis:
-
The cons lure you with something tempting.
-
They gain your trust.
-
They sweeten the pot to make you really consider biting.
-
They close the deal.
To do so, they employ any number of strategies at each step. "The
pitches are social-influence cocktails, just jam-packed with one tactic
after another," says Pratkanis.
To lure you in initially, the scammers will generally use "phantom
fixation" -- the promise of something tantalizing that never
materializes. The Nigerian scam is a great example of this. In exchange
for the use of your bank account to move funds out of another country,
you're told you'll receive millions of dollars. People become so
distracted by the notion of instant wealth that they're willing to throw
their usual caution to the wind. The scam is closed when people fork
over money for "incidental fees" to move the money to their account or
divulge private bank account information that can be used to move money
out of the account.
"(Victims) are not thinking logically because they're so obsessed with
getting the money," says Shadel.
For step 2, gaining your trust, scammers will often use what Shadel and
Pratkanis call the "command of authority" and the premise that your help
is direly needed. Again, the Nigerian scam utilizes both of these: The
scam is in the form of a personal plea for help, often from a supposed
former high-ranking official from a foreign government. The
official-sounding titles and ranks sprinkled throughout are meant to
wrap a cloak of legitimacy around the plea.
And the plea for help is more than an appeal to your conscience, Shadel
says. It's meant to mistakenly give you the feeling that you're in
control of the situation and can walk away at any time. Other tactics
used to gain your trust include friendly persuasion, which is just what
it sounds like, and the "expert snare," where the con artist tries to
make you feel like an expert who should be able to recognize a great
opportunity when you see one.
Sweetening the scam
Making a scam appear too good to pass up is critical. There are five
tactics generally used here:
-
Creating the landscape:
A scammer will try to limit your use of outside information to
investigate the scam. Some victims are told they're being given a
secret opportunity that would be jeopardized if others found out.
With Internet scams, there is often ample opportunity to investigate
them before taking the bait. But as Barbara Mikkelson, who runs the
hoax- and myth-busting site
Snopes.com,
points out, it's sometimes easier said than done. With the foreign
money offers, so many of the names and stories change that unless
you know you're looking for information on the "Nigerian scam," it
can be difficult to track down the real story. (She says this old
scheme still generates more mail to her site than any other
financially related scam.)
-
Comparison:
One example is when an old price is scratched out and a new one is
listed so that you can clearly see the "deal" you're getting.
-
Social proof:
A scammer will try to make it sound as if lots of people have
already benefited from this scheme, so that you might think, "If
everyone is doing it, it must be good."
-
Self-generated persuasion:
Arguably a softer sell than some of the other tactics, the
perpetrator plants an idea but lets you use your own imagination to
fill in the gaps. Pratkanis notes one scammer who said he wanted the
victim to picture everything he might do with a large sum of money
-- and would contact him in a week to hear the ideas. A week was
plenty of time for the potential of all that money to really take
hold of the victim's imagination.
-
Scarcity:
"When something is made scarce, it triggers three processes,"
Pratkanis says. "1) In our head, we think, if it's rare it must be
valuable; 2) it creates panic – 'if I don't get it now I may never
get it'; and 3) it makes you special (for owning it)." Shadel cites
the example of gold coins that aren't worth what they're sold for as
one scam that takes advantage of this tactic.
Closing the deal
By the time a scammer is ready to close the deal, he may try to take
advantage of the norm of reciprocity. This is the notion that if I've
done something for you, you should do something for me, Shadel says. The
con artist may have given you something of perceived value or done
something for you in order to create a feeling of obligation. Pratkanis
relates a tale where a scammer found out his potential victim was also
being played by another con artist. He reported the other guy to the
police and took credit for the good deed with the victim only to later
defraud her himself.
Other strategies for closing the deal include:
-
A door-in-the-face:
This is when a scammer proposes something farfetched, such as
sending them a large sum of money, which causes you to turn them
down. The scammer will then approach with a much smaller request
you're more likely to grant.
-
Reverse psychology:
Instead of pressuring you, Shadel says, the con might say something
like "it's completely up to you what you want to do" or "I wouldn't
blame you at all if you wanted to just say no. A lot of people have
trouble with making a lot of money." These appeals work because they
don't appear to limit your freedom, and they tap into the tendency
to do the opposite of what is asked.
-
Commitment and consistency:
With this strategy, a con will ask for a seemingly easy "commitment"
up front. It may feel like no more than agreeing with a statement
like "You want to make money, don't you?" But when you later try to
bail on the deal at hand, the con will bring up your earlier
commitment to make you feel you're caught being inconsistent.
If
you're still not biting, the scammer may resort to fear and
intimidation. Used all too frequently, according to Shadel, this can
take the form of personal insults and sky-is-falling threats.
Why they work
All of
these tactics are meant to put the consumer in a specific role, says
Pratkanis. And because the con is orchestrating the role you're in, he
has tremendous control over the outcome.
These
strategies also tend to be successful because we're used to seeing many
legitimate businesses use them. "Sales people have known about these
tactics for a long time," says Shadel. When McDonald's advertises the
number of burgers served, it's using social proof. Click on a cable
home-shopping TV channel and you'll see many tactics at work
simultaneously, notably scarcity, social proof and comparison. The
difference with scammers, though, is that they'll often take things to
an ugly level, using fear and outright deception to get you to cave.
And
finally, most people are looking for easy ways to make decisions, Shadel
says. "The (social-influence tactics) exploit our very human tendency to
want to take decision-making shortcuts by blindly complying to habits,
patterns and cultural norms. The con is counting on such compliance." |